17 or higher[43] In other imaging modalities

for detecti

17 or higher.[43] In other imaging modalities

for detecting the liver injury, Oki et al. introduced the usefulness of elastography (FibroScan; Echosens, Paris, France), and demonstrated that the stiffness of the liver was increased after chemotherapy within 48 h and that the hepatic stiffness gradually this website increased after repeated FOLFOX4 in some cases with liver injury.[44] The observed stiffness of the liver may cause portal hypertension and splenomegaly after repeated chemotherapy. Regarding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there were two interesting reports using contrast radiography. Ward et al. suggested that superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced T2-weighted gradient echo imaging before hepatectomy was useful to evaluate subclinical SOS with L-OHP treatment.[40] They graded the presence and severity of abnormal areas of reticular hyperintensity on a 4-point ordinal scale (0, none; 1, fine reticulations visible on a minority

of sections; 2, diffuse reticulations or localized, coalescent areas of high signal; and 3, diffuse reticulations visible on all sections or densely coalescent areas of high signal visible on multiple sections), and defined that a severity score of 2 or 3 was considered positive for SOS. Recently, gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid has been well known as a newly available hepatobiliary contrast agent, which had both dynamic 上海皓元 and hepatobiliary phase imaging ability for the qualitative diagnosis ZD1839 ic50 of liver tumors. Shin et al. also graded the presence of reticular hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase images using a 5-point original scale (1, definitely not present; 2, probably not present; 3, equivocal; 4, probably present; 5, definitely present).[45] They defined that their confidence score of 4 or 5 was considered positive diagnosis for SOS. Ethoxybenzyl MRI may be established as the most useful imaging

modality to evaluate both tumor detection or diagnosis and severity of liver injury induced by preoperative chemotherapy as a “one-stop shop”. Regarding predictive factors of sinusoidal injury induced by preoperative chemotherapy, Nakano et al. reported that using ICG-R15 and the aspartate aminotransferase level before hepatectomy they were able to predict the occurrence of SOS.[32] Soubrane et al. indicated high preoperative APR score as the most reliable indicator.[48] In their report, the mean interval between chemotherapy and surgery was 7.2 weeks. Brouquet et al. demonstrated that serum γ-glutamyltransferase level before chemotherapy was an independent high-risk factor of SOS. Interestingly, they also suggested that aspirin intake was an independent factor associated with a reduced risk for SOS.

Related posts:

  1. Spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed at an outside ins
  2. 159 Combined with neurochemical imaging (such as receptor imagin
  3. In summary, bioluminescent imaging as being a surrogate for receptor tyrosine ki
  4. Maraviroc Entinostat plus higher-dose dexamethasone versus
  5. 2004) Because this protein forms a latent complex with TGF-��, o
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>