Cells were defined as border cells if (1) the spatial information

Cells were defined as border cells if (1) the spatial information content in the recorded selleck screening library data was higher than the corresponding 95th percentile in the shuffled data, and (2) the border score from the recorded data was

higher than the 95th percentile for border scores in the shuffled data. Border cell stability was estimated by calculating the spatial correlation between first and second half of the trial and between consecutive trials in the same session. The periodicity of the rate maps was evaluated for all cells with average rates above 0.2 Hz by calculating a spatial autocorrelation map for each smoothed rate map (Sargolini et al., 2006). The degree of spatial periodicity was determined for each recorded cell by taking a central circular sample of the autocorrelogram, with the central peak excluded, and comparing rotated versions of this sample (Sargolini et al., 2006 and Langston et al., 2010). The Pearson correlation of the circular sample with its rotation in α degrees was obtained

for angles of 60° and 120° on one side and Buparlisib 30°, 90°, and 150° on the other. The cell’s grid score was defined as the minimum difference between any of the elements in the first group and any of the elements in the second. Grid cells were identified as cells in which (1) spatial information content and (2) rotational-symmetry-based grid scores exceeded the 95th percentiles of distributions of spatial information content and grid scores, respectively, in shuffled versions of the same data. Shuffling was performed as for border cells, with 400 permutation trials per recorded cell. Grid cell stability was estimated by calculating the spatial correlation between the first and the second half of individual trials or

between consecutive trials. The rat’s head direction was calculated for each tracker sample from the projection of the relative position of the two LEDs onto the horizontal plane. The directional tuning function for each cell was obtained by plotting the firing rate as a function of the rat’s directional heading. Maps for number of spikes and time were smoothed individually with 14.5° mean window filter (14 bins on each side). Directional information was calculated for each cell as for spatial found information content, with λiλi as the mean firing rate of a unit in the i-  th bin, λλ as the overall mean firing rate, and pi as the frequency at which the animal’s head pointed in the i-th directional bin. Directional stability was estimated by correlating firing rates between the first and second half of the trial or between consecutive trials. Directional tuning was estimated by computing the length of the mean vector for the circular distribution of firing rate. Head direction cells were identified as cells in which (1) directional information content and (2) mean vector length exceeded the 95th percentiles of distributions of directional information content and mean vector lengths, respectively, in shuffled versions of the same data.

Related posts:

  1. Examination of information All information have been estimated ut
  2. Fluorescence signals from pimonidazole adducts showed an inhomogeneous spatial d
  3. The citric acid information fluctuated, but was reduce in MT than
  4. This means that these cells feature a particular sensitivity for
  5. Oval cells and stellate cells are amongst the very first cells to
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>