Some patients with task-specific musician’s dystonia, for example, train to be ‘unfocused’ while practising their instrument, because this technique might lead to improvement of symptoms during playing. There have been a large number of studies of the effects
of attention on sensory systems. click here In general, they show that attention to a stimulus of a given modality that is presented at an expected location and time increases the activity evoked in the brain. This occurs mainly in the appropriate primary sensory area of the cortex, together with activity in frontoparietal association areas. The latter is seen during attention to any modality of sensation and may represent a control network for attentional focussing (Behrmann et al., 2004; Ptak, 2012). As a preventative method and for ‘healthy’ training of musicians, techniques of systematic variation of the locus of attention are used, such as focussing on external (usually tactile) stimuli or diversion away from the fingers involved in the task to distant body parts buy Epigenetics Compound Library such as the legs or feet (Loosch, 2004). In contrast to its positive effects on sensory function, attention to movement is often viewed as a negative factor. The sports training literature emphasizes the importance of the focus
of attention; attention to movement itself (an ‘internal’ focus) may interfere with optimal performance, whereas attention to the consequences of the action (an ‘external’ focus) may be helpful (Wulf & Prinz, 2001). The same may be true in people with disorders of movement, for example task specific musician’s dystonia. A similar balance between types of attention has been proposed to occur during motor learning. It is a common
experience that, if attention is diverted away from a task, learning is generally poorer (Song, 2009). However, excessive focus on the details of a task can be associated with poor performance (Nideffer, 1976) and perhaps even development of O-methylated flavonoid a task-specific movement disorder (McDaniel et al., 1989; Sachdev, 1992; Adler et al., 2005). It has been suggested that there are two distinct systems, an attentional (conscious control) and a non-attentional (subconscious) system, that operate during motor learning (Hazeltine et al., 1997; Blischke & Reiter, 2002), and that engaging both systems in the correct proportions during training leads to efficient motor learning. Learning suffers when there is too much conscious attention to details of the task. A comparison of the activation patterns of healthy professional guitar players and those with task-specific dystonia demonstrated that, in healthy players, a switch between systems compatible with the two systems was far more balanced (Pujol et al., 2000). In healthy humans the impact of attention seems less obvious. There have been few investigations into the physiological consequences of attention on the motor system (see, for examples: Noppeney et al., 1999; Johansen-Berg & Matthews, 2002; Rowe et al., 2002; Thomson et al., 2008).
Related posts:
- Analyses of neural activities at the end of the secondary task sh
- An increased P1, can also be found during recognition of task irr
- In order to have an accurate assessment of task performance in th
- , 1992a, 1992b, 1993) A dichotomy of learning mechanisms has als
- We also investigated the expression of various transcription fact