Table 4 Sensitivities and specificities of multiplex real-time PC

Table 4 Sensitivities and specificities of multiplex real-time PCR for detection of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Species Reference test Detection

limit of the assay Cutoff 105 copies/mL     Sensitivity Specificity PPV a NPV b Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV S. pneumoniae BAL culture, blood culture and urinary antigen test 95% (20/21) 75% (101/135) 37% (20/54) 99% click here (101/102) 90% (19/21) 80% (108/135) 41% (19/46) 98% (108/110)   BAL culture, blood culture and urinary antigen tes + lytA PCR 91% (43/47) 89% (97/109) 78% (43/55) 96% (97/101) 79% (37/47) 95% (104/109) 88% (37/42) 91% (104/114) H. influenzae BAL culturec 90% (28/31) 65% (81/125) 39% (28/72) 96% (81/84) 81% (25/31) 85% (106/125) 57% (25/44) 95% (106/112)

  BAL culturec + fucK PCRd 93% (69/74) 96% (79/82) 96% (69/72) 94% (79/84) 63% (47/74) 100.0% (82/82) 100% (47/47) 75% (82/109) a Positive predictive value b Negative predictive value c Blood culture were Rucaparib also performed for H. influenzae but all were negative d fucK PCR was performed in the PCR positive and culture negative samples Analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage from 156 adults with lower respiratory tract infection. Among 103 patients treated with antibiotic before sampling, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were identified by culture in 6% (6/103) and 20% (21/103) respectively, and by qmPCR in 36% (37/103) and 53% (55/103) respectively. Of 22 patients positive by Spn9802 PCR and lytA PCR alone 19 of them had antibiotics prior to sampling. Figure 2 shows the quantitative results of the qmPCR compared to semi-quantitative culture of BAL specimens for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. There was no correlation between the measured DNA copy number/mL and the bacterial growth. Figure 2 Quantitative results of the multiplex real-time PCR compared medroxyprogesterone to semi-quantitative culture of

BAL specimens. Table 5 shows results of tests for S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis in patients with meningitis. Of 87 CSF samples, S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis were detected by culture in 5 (6%) and 2 (2%) samples, by 16 S rRNA PCR in 14 (16%) and 10 (11%) and by qmPCR and in 14 (16%) and 10 (11%) samples respectively. Altogether, culture, 16 S rRNA PCR and qmPCR were positive for S. pneumoniae in 14 cases, N. meningitidis in 10 cases, and H. influenzae in no case. If culture and the 16 S rRNA PCR in combination were used as reference standard for aetiology of meningitis, the sensitivities and specificities would be 100% and 100% for both S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis. Two samples positive by the ctrA PCR were positive in the unspecific 16 S rRNA PCR and sequence analysis of the PCR product determined them as Neisseria spp. They were considered as N. meningitidis in the specificity calculation.

Related posts:

  1. Method of optimization of your asymmetric multiplex Real-Time PCR For process op
  2. We thank Mari Koivisto, Department of Biostatistics, University o
  3. Table 5 Grading of growth, of 19 ESBL A – or AmpC-producing Shige
  4. 19 Nevertheless, there is still a real clinical need for fast-act
  5. Real-time PCR of estrogen receptors Gene expression information w
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>