The ability to inhibit emotional responses is generally measured by a paradigm in which individuals view an emotional scene or are asked to retrieve an emotional memory (typically negative in valence) and then are either told to not think about the item or to distance themselves from the emotion it conveys. Such inhibition over emotional information generally involves activation of a wide variety of right prefrontal regions including the right superior, middle and inferior gyri (see [24]
for meta-analysis and review). Moreover, suppression of emotional responses specifically engages right dorsolateral and ventrolateral (i.e., inferior) regions this website as compared to re-appraisal of emotion (e.g., reframing one’s thoughts about a graphic picture of a surgical procedure as indicating that someone will be cured of an ailment, rather than focusing on the degree of injury) [25]. At face value, many of these same regions are those implicated in the inhibition of a motoric response. Moreover, additional evidence hints at a common mechanism of inhibitory
control across domains. For example, decreased activity in rIFG in individuals with ADHD during inhibition of memory retrieval is associated with poorer performance on a motoric test of inhibitory function, the stop-signal task [23]. As yet another example, suppressing phosphatase inhibitor library emotional reactivity impairs performance on a subsequent task of cognitive control, the Stroop task, and leads to decreased activity in right
lateral prefrontal cortex during performance of the Stroop task [26]. Finally, behavioral data suggest that these aspects of inhibitory function may be somewhat shared yet also dissociable [27]. As such, a central question remains as to whether there is a central and common right hemisphere system that is involved in inhibitory control regardless of the domain in which such control is exhibited, or whether there are indeed fractionations within the right hemisphere with regards to regions that play a role in inhibitory function over motoric, cognitive, and emotional domains respectively. If inhibitory control really is a by-product of top-down mechanisms that actively maintain goals and modulate the activity most of other brain regions to meet those goals, one would suspect a high degree of overlap across domains. To the degree that there are special systems for inhibitory control in particular domains (e.g., rIFG for inhibition of motor responses), then the critical regions would be predicted to be distinct. One of the striking aspects of the studies reviewed above is the clear lateralization of function, with right prefrontal regions differentially engaged as compared to left prefrontal regions across most aspects of inhibitory control. As of yet, the underlying reason for this rather dramatic degree of lateralization remains unclear.
Related posts:
- peptide calculator was found to inhibit aromatase activity
- 64 The layer-specific changes in neuronal density and size ident
- It will be very likely the responses are usually not associated w
- 28) Yan et al 29) evaluated the ability of molecular ultrasound t
- For example, the classic effects of ventrolateral prefrontal and