The objective was to apply the proposed prescribing indicators to

The objective was to apply the proposed prescribing indicators tool to a cohort of older Australians, to NVP-BKM120 supplier assess its use in detecting potential DRPs. Methods 

The prescribing indicators tool was applied in a cross-sectional observational study to 126 older (aged ≥65 years) English-speaking Australians taking five or more medications, as they were being discharged from a small private hospital into the community. Indicators were unmet when prescribing did not adhere to indicator tool guidelines. Key findings  We found a high incidence of under-treatment, and use of inappropriate medications. There were on average 18 applicable indicators per patient, with each patient having on average seven unmet indicators. Conclusion  The use of a prescribing indicators tool for commonly used medications and common medical conditions in older Australians may contribute to the efficient identification of DRPs. “
“To compare the diagnostic ability of pharmacists, nurses and general practitioners

(GPs) for a range of skin conditions. An online study comprising 10 specifically developed dermatological http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-737.html case studies containing a digital image of the skin condition and a short case history. A total of 60 participants (20 representing each of pharmacists, GPs and primary care nurses) were required to identify the skin condition as well as the features in the case history that supported the diagnosis and the recommended first-line management approach for the condition. The mean diagnostic scores for each group were GPs = 8.8 (95% confidence interval, CI, 7.9–9.6), pharmacists = 6.2 (95% CI, 5.4–6.9) and nurses = 7.0 (95% CI, 6.1–7.9). Post hoc analysis revealed that the difference in mean diagnostic scores was significant (P < 0.05) between GPs and both pharmacists and nurses. However, pharmacists' diagnostic accuracy was similar to GPs' for some skin conditions such as tinea corporis, PIK3C2G scabies and plantar warts and overall at least 40% of pharmacists

correctly identified all conditions. This small study has demonstrated that for all of the skin conditions considered, pharmacists’ overall diagnostic scores were significantly different from those of GPs but similar to those of nurses for the conditions assessed. However, further work with a larger sample is required to determine the accuracy of these preliminary findings and to establish whether advice given by pharmacists in practice results in the appropriate course of action being taken. “
“This study used a ‘Lean’ technique, the ‘waste walk’ to evaluate the activities of clinical pharmacists with reference to the seven wastes described in ‘Lean’ including ‘defects’, ‘unnecessary motion’, ‘overproduction’, ‘transport of products or material’, ‘unnecessary waiting’, ‘unnecessary inventory’ and ‘inappropriate processing’.

Related posts:

  1. With regard to generic prescribing, dispensing and awareness, the
  2. The idea of identifying biodiversity indicators is therefore not
  3. Among these,

    the following indicators of forest soil qual
  4. Many optimization methods have been proposed to solve inverse pro
  5. The main objective of the present study was the optimization of o
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>