To achieve optimum

esthetics, strong all-ceramic cores ar

To achieve optimum

esthetics, strong all-ceramic cores are veneered with a ceramic material, which is built in successive layers, giving the final restoration individual optical characteristics that can barely be distinguished from the surrounding natural dentition. Successful performance MLN0128 and reliability of these restorations may be limited by mechanical integrity and adhesion of the veneering porcelain to the ceramic substrate.1 The mechanical properties of the core and veneering porcelains should match to achieve a durable bond.2 The Cohesive Plateau theory states that the strength of a bonded interface should equal the cohesive strength of the substrate with which it is formed.3 In addition, studies testing the porcelain-to-metal bond strength suggest that shear bond strength (SBS) equal to the shear strength of the veneering porcelain provided an adequate

bond.4 In a study by Kelly et al5 on the failure behavior of In-Ceram fixed partial dentures, it was reported that Selleckchem PD0325901 failure occurred in the connectors, none from contact damage, with approximately 70% to 78% originating from the core/veneer interface, indicating that the interface was a location of high tensile stress, in part due to the elastic modulus mismatch across the interface and the presence of structural flaws. The survival of multimaterial clinical structures is also influenced by material thickness ratios, geometric design factors, processing variables, thermal properties, and mechanical and elastic properties of component materials. Most cracks in

multimaterial structures are initiated at the interface of the core and veneer.5–7 Core ceramics are generally high elastic modulus, high strength materials compared with veneering ceramics. Stress distributions and failure behavior are different in laminate structures, comprised of materials with different elastic properties, than in homogenous structures.5 Moreover, interfaces can also be the site of unique defects, boundary phases, and thermal incompatibility stresses. To ensure structured integrity of layered restorations under functional loads and to prevent chipping and delamination of the veneer ceramic, the core/veneer bond 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 must be of a certain minimal strength. Stress distribution in a two-phase material construction is more complex than a homogenous one-phase material construction; therefore, additional factors must be considered for layered restorations.8 Thermal expansion behavior, firing shrinkage, interface toughness and roughness, and heating and cooling rates are all factors that must be carefully handled to prevent generation of undesired tensile stresses.9 All-ceramic crowns are fabricated into layered structures with esthetic but weak veneer porcelains on stiff and strong ceramic support cores.10 Hopkins11 and Zeng et al12 have shown that a thin layer of veneering porcelain fired on a ceramic material diminishes the strength of 2-layer test specimens.

Related posts:

  1. 05), and Syntac Variolink was significantly higher than that of M
  2. 24 The preimpregnation of fibers with the light polymerizable res
  3. 31 Mpa (Graphs ​(Graphs22 and ​and3),3), Group II = 7 37 Mpa (Gra
  4. Application of the irrigating solutions and bonding procedures Th
  5. Cavity preparation with rotary instruments or others results in t
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>