Author Archives: admin

6 ± 0.708 min using a single Gaussian distribution function: selleck chemical i.e., Eq. 7 with α = 1 and β = 0; Methods Section). However, when CI < ca. 100 CFU mL-1 there was a clear broadening in the … Continue reading →

To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the separate relationships between 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3 and bone outcomes in childhood. Since 25(OH)D3 makes the major contribution to total 25(OH)D, it is relevant to compare our findings with those from these previous … Continue reading →

Real-time PCR primers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S4. Relative RNA level of a particular gene in mutant strains was normalized to that of wild type using the 2−ΔΔCt method with 16S rRNA or recA as reference gene … Continue reading →

sakei regulated by σLsa H, the experimental system described above was used in a full-genome comparative transcriptome analysis of sigH(hy)* and sigH(wt)* after one hour induction with 30 μM CuSO4. Quantification and statistical analysis of the microarray data (see Methods … Continue reading →

0 7.0 0.4 62.2 ± 2.6 62.4 47.1 ± 2.8 47.9 29.1 ± 2.5 27.5 11 0 +1 3.7 5.0 7.0 0.4 125.3 ± 0.8 123.7 54.1 ± 0.2 53.5 44.9 ± 2.9 51.9 12 +1 +1 7.4 5.0 7.0 0.4 140.2 ± 8.0 140.7 78.8 ± 0.5 78.5 61.1 ± 1.9 55.6 *The cultivations were performed in … Continue reading →

Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3797–3800.CrossRef 17. Tcherepanov V, Ehlers A, Upton C: Genome Annotation Transfer Utility (GATU): rapid annotation of viral genomes using a closely related reference genome. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:150.CrossRefPubMed Authors’ contributions PM conceived the study, designed the analytical procedure … Continue reading →

No fluorescence was ever recorded in DNA from the soil samples collected outside the truffière in any of the experimental sites. The mean concentration of T. magnatum DNA detected in the four different truffières was statistically different indicating that environmental … Continue reading →

It was found that the CTA+/SiO2 molar ratios of M-1, M-2, and M-3 were 0.16, 0.14, and 0.13, respectively, which were in the range of 0.1 to 0.2, a value previously found for a well-organized hexagonal mesophase [25]. From this … Continue reading →

BJU Int 2007, 99: 1223–1229.CrossRefPubMed 16. Jones TD, Eble JN, Cheng L: Application of molecular diagnostic techniques to renal epithelial neoplasms. Clin Lab Med 2005, 25: 279–303.CrossRefPubMed 17. Kovacs A, Storkel S, Thoenes W, Kovacs G: Mitochondrial and chromosomal DNA … Continue reading →

J Bacteriol 2006,188(6):2290–2293.PubMedCrossRef 17. Marsh IB, Whittington RJ: Genomic diversity in Mycobacterium avium: single nucleotide polymorphisms CRT0066101 between the S and C strains of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and with M. a. avium. Mol Cell Probes 2007,21(1):66–75.PubMedCrossRef 18. Paustian ML, … Continue reading →