1A) A modest increase in the absolute numbers of Tconv cells was

1A). A modest increase in the absolute numbers of Tconv cells was also seen (Fig. 1D). A similar enhancement in Treg cells was seen in mice treated with a different preparation of Fc-GITR-L [13], but these authors did not observe any increase in Tconv cells. To determine if GITR stimulation modulated Treg-cell function, we purified CD4+CD25+T cells from Fc-GITR-L and IgG1-injected mice and assessed their suppressive capacity in vitro (Supporting Information Fig. 1B). Treg cells from Fc-GITR-L-treated

mice were as suppressive as Treg cells from control human IgG1-treated mice. The increase in Treg cells was transient and the percentage of Foxp3+ T cells returned to normal by day 9 after treatment (Supporting Information Fig. Selleckchem Opaganib 1C). Previous studies suggested that treatment of mice with an agonist anti-GITR mAb, following anti-CD25 depletion of Treg cells, was capable of enhancing the pathogenicity of autoantigen-specific T cells in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model [18]. One problem with this approach is that Treg-cell depletion is usually incomplete and Treg cells rapidly

repopulate the treated animals [19]. To more directly address the effects of GITR stimulation on Teff cell numbers and function, we used the IBD model [20] and transferred CD4+CD45RBhi Foxp3− T cells into RAG KO mice SRT1720 ic50 followed by weekly treatment with Fc-GITR-L (100 μg/mouse i.v.). Mice treated with Fc-GITR-L exhibited a markedly enhanced loss of weight compared with mice that just received CD4+CD45RBhi T cells (Fig. 2A). The percentage of CD4+ T cells secreting IFN-γ was similar in treated and control animals (Fig. 2B and D), but the absolute number of CD4+ T cells secreting IFN-γ was markedly increased in the mesenteric LN (Fig. 2C). In contrast, we observed no changes in either the percentages or absolute numbers of IL-17-producing T cells (Fig. 2E and F).

Teff-cell expansion was also reflected in enhanced Ki67 staining in the treated mice (Fig. 2G and H). Thus, engagement of the GITR by GITR-L in vivo has no effect on T-cell differentiation, but significantly augments the absolute number of pathogenic IFN-γ producing T cells and disease severity. Our results are similar to the effects of medroxyprogesterone GITR engagement that have been reported [21] on CD8+ Teff cells in a viral model where GITR engagement increased CD8+ T-cell expansion without enhancing their effector functions. Small percentages of Foxp3+ iTreg cells were observed in mice that received CD4+CD45RBhi Foxp3− T cells, but the percentages were the same in untreated or GITR-L-treated mice (data not shown). The GITR is also expressed on APCs and NK cells at a low levels [2] and it has been suggested [22, 23] that some of the effects of GITR engagement in vivo may be secondary to modulation of innate immune functions. To address this issue, we transferred CD4+CD45RBhi T cells from GITR−/− mice to RAG−/− mice (Supporting Information Fig. 2A).

Related posts:

  1. Total, the observed variations in HDAC expression propose the lik
  2. To determine whether rSj16 could induce regulatory T cells in vit
  3. Induction of in vitro Treg cells was most easily accomplished wit
  4. tion demonstrated binding among FOXP3 and also the following pa
  5. Toward this end, we stimulated equal numbers of sorted OT2 and OT
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>