(C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.”
“Introduction: The diagnosis of latent tuberculosis (LTB) in patients FK506 concentration with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become important with the introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF-alpha) agents and the appearance of active tuberculosis cases in these
patients. The tuberculin skin test (TST) has limited value in patients with RA. Tests based on the release of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) are being studied, but their role has not been well established for this group of patients.\n\nObjectives: To compare the diagnosis of LTB in patients with RA by using cellular immune response to the TST and T.SPOT-TB. Additionally, findings of tomography studies compatible with LTB were used.\n\nMethods: Clinical evaluation, TST. T.SPOT-TB and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in a group of patients with RA at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Goias.\n\nResults: Response to the TST was lower in patients
with RA (13.5%) compared HDAC inhibitor to the predicted values of the general population. T.SPOT-TB identified a higher number of patients with LTB than the TST (36.8%). HRCT showed changes Compatible with LTB in 52.9% of the patients, including 8 of the 11 patients with negative TST and T.SPOT-TB.\n\nConclusions: The TST by itself is insufficient to diagnose LTB. A higher number of positive 3-Methyladenine chemical structure results were obtained with T.SPOT-TB when compared to the TST. Nevertheless, it was negative in a large percentage of patients with tomography findings consistent with LTB. HRCT is readily available in most large health-care centers and it could be incorporated into the diagnostic strategy for LTB in patients with RA. (C) 2011 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.”
“In this work, the post-yield behaviour of cortical bone is investigated using finite element modelling, nanoindentation and atomic force microscopy. Based on recent investigations, it is proposed that, since pressure dependent deformation mechanisms may contribute to
yielding in bone, constitutive models attempting to capture its post-yield behaviour should also incorporate pressure dependence. Nanoindentation testing is performed using a spheroconical indenter tip, and subsequent atomic force microscopy at the indented site shows that bone does not exhibit surface pile-up. By simulating the nanoindentation test, it is found that a Mises based constitutive law cannot simultaneously capture the deformations and load-displacement curve produced during nanoindentation. However, an extended Drucker-Prager model can capture the post-yield behaviour of bone accurately, since it accounts for pressure dependent yield. This suggests that frictional mechanisms are central to the post-yield behaviour of bone.
Related posts: