Every processor consisted of a high-pass filter, a first degree d

Every processor consisted of a high-pass filter, a first degree demodulator, and a down-sampler. Then, these amplitudes were mapped to the elbow torque using parametric models determined by system identification methods. They applied both agonist and antagonist muscles to account for co-contraction. Consequently, the torque estimation procedure was improved using advanced Nilotinib bcr-Abl inhibitor EMG amplitude processors (multi-channel and whitened), longer training data duration, and determining model parameters by pseudo-inverse and ridge regression besides linear LSs method. Wiener and Hammerstein nonlinear models were also investigated,

because of their fewer parameters. The performance of the dynamic, nonlinear, parametric models with the second or third degree polynomial functions of EMG amplitude were better than linear, wiener, and Hammerstein models. The other nonlinear model proposed for EMG-torque relationship considered the torque as an unknown coefficient of EMG envelope of a muscle with an unknown power,[26] and the total torque was considered as the sum of these functions for several muscles.[27] Minimizing mean square error between the measured and estimated torque signal could be done by Interior-Reflective Newton Algorithm (IRNA).[28] Furthermore, particle swarm optimization (PSO) method was

applied for finding unknown coefficients in.[27] This new study showed nearly the same error as IRNA for estimating the torque, however the IRNA needs initializations of some of the parameters and constraints found by trial-and-errors to find the optimum, which is random for PSO. Furthermore, this model does not need predefined musculoskeletal parameters (e.g. parallel elastic stiffness and damping). Staudenmann et al.[29] showed an improvement in estimating torque using high-density sEMG of triceps muscle and principal component analysis (PCA). This method showed decrease of phase cancellation, because every

MU activity was recorded separately. Moreover, it was not compulsory to place electrodes in line with muscle fiber by this method. They found out that PCA preprocessing improves the performance of sEMG-based muscle force estimation. Most of the clinical studies performed in this area are based on either calculating correlation/regression coefficients from sEMG and muscle force[30,31,32] or fitting biomechanical models with predefined physiological parameters or complex biomechanical simulations.[33,34] Anacetrapib In the former methods, no physiological activation pattern is provider while in the later ones, additional kinematical information is required. The goal of our study was proposing a modeling approach based on classical system identification theory to model muscle force using only sEMG of the involving muscles. In this area, variety of linear/nonlinear black-box models have been proposed.[2,4,23,24,27,29,35] None of which could provide qualitative/quantitative motor control strategies.

Related posts:

  1. [45,46] In the optimization procedure, the linear parameters of t
  2. Moreover, it is possible to exhibit high levels of yawning witho
  3. To confirm this in the protein degree, we usedWestern blotting to
  4. KM 1 medium consisted of 8 g Difco nutri ent broth, 5 g NaCl, 20
  5. There was a mean 26% greater PGE2 degree in central tumour region
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>