Ninety-six patients with primary extranodal DLBCL receiving R-CHOP therapy were analyzed to evaluate whether immunophenotype and size of bulky disease are significantly important. The International Prognostic Index was still an important prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.003, p = 0.027). Difference of survival between germinal center (GC) type and non-GC type was not different (PFS: p = 0.192; OS: p = 0.197). In two separated groups according to extranodal maximum tumor diameter (EN-MTD) 7.5 cm as cutoff value for survival, the group of EN-MTD a parts per thousand yen7.5 cm had lower PFS and OS than < 7.5
cm (PFS: p = 0.001; OS: p = 0.008). In four divided subgroups according to EN-MTD combined with immunophenotype, the subgroup of non-GC XR9576 Selleckchem Nepicastat type with EN-MTD a parts per thousand yen 7.5 cm had lower PFS and OS compared with the other subgroups (PFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that non-GC with EN-MTD a parts per thousand yen 7.5 cm was an independent prognostic
parameter (PFS: HR = 5.407, 95%CI = 2.378-12.294, p < 0.001; OS: HR = 4.136, 95%CI = 1.721-9.941, p = 0.002). Bulky primary extranodal DLBCL would be associated with unfavorable outcome especially in non-GC type.”
“Background: Partner violence may interfere with a woman’s ability to maintain continuous contraception and therefore contribute to increased risk of pregnancy among childbearing women.\n\nStudy design: A retrospective review of medical records (N=2000) was conducted from four family planning clinics in the northeast United States. Eligibility criteria for inclusion were as follows: (1) female, (2) reproductive age (menarche
through menopause), (3) seeking reproductive services and (4) clinic visit for annual gynecologic exam between 2006 and 2011.\n\nResults: Partner violence was documented in 28.5% (n=569) of medical records. Chronicity of violence influenced contraceptive patterns and pregnancy risk. Women reporting past year partner violence only [odds VX-770 in vivo ratio (OR)=10.2] and violence during the last 5 years (OR=10.6) had the highest odds of not using a current method of contraception. Women reporting recent exposure to violence were most likely to change birth control methods and use emergency contraception (OR=6.5). Women experiencing any history of violence reported more frequent contraceptive method changes during the previous year.\n\nConclusions: A history of partner violence was common among women utilizing family planning services. The chronicity of violence appeared to play a significant role in contraceptive method changes, types of methods used and pregnancy risk.
Related posts:
- 7% to 60% in patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment for vari
- CTCs represent tumor cells that have left the primary tumor and a
- Primary pattern 3 patients continued to exhibit superior bPFS in
- Survival of pomalidomide-treated PMF patients was compared to other PMF patients
- The rarity of primary hepatic NET makes it difficult to suspect a