Results Salmonella prevalence and the serotypes Salmonella was is

Results Salmonella prevalence and the serotypes Salmonella was isolated from 383 (53%) of the total of 729 feces learn more samples from apparently healthy animals. Isolates were obtained from 159 (52%) of the cattle feces, 192 (55%) of the chicken feces, 8 (16%) of the swine feces and 24 (96%) of the hedgehog feces (Table 1). Of the 383 isolates, 382 belonged to S. enterica

ssp. enterica and one was S. enterica ssp. salamae. 364 of the S. enterica ssp. enterica isolates could be serotyped in detail, while for 18 isolates only the Salmonella group could be assigned. 60 different serotypes were found from the cattle, 41 from the chicken, 5 from the swine and 8 from the hedgehog feces. The predominant serotypes were S. Drac and S. Muenster in the cattle, S. Derby and S. Chester in the poultry and S. Muenster in both the swine and hedgehog feces. The 3 S. Typhimurium isolates from the cattle all belonged to variant Copenhagen. Phage typing divided the S. Typhimurium isolates further into three definite phage types: DTs 2, 56 and 116 (Figure 1). In addition, 9 strains were RDNC (reacts but do not conform). Table 1 Salmonella enterica serotypes

isolated from cattle, poultry, swine and hedgehog feces and their antimicrobial resistance patterns Salmonella serotypes Cattle feces (n = 304) Poultry feces (n = 350) Swine feces (n = 50) MK5108 Hedgehog feces (n = 25) Total (n = 729) Antimicrobial resistance patterns Resistanta Intermediatea S. Abaetetuba 1 1 – - 2 – 1Pstr-tet, 1Cstr S. Abony – 1 – - 1 -

– S. Adelaide – 1 – - 1 – - S. Agona – 3 – - 3 – 1Pstr-sul, 1Cstr S. Albany 2 2 – - 4 – 1Ptet, 1Cstr S. Anatum – 1 – - 1 – 1Pstr S. Ank – 1 – 4 5 – 4Hstr, 1Pstr S. Antwepen 1 – - – 1 – 1Cstr S. Apeyeme 2 3 – - 5 2Cstr 3Pstr S. Banana 1 2 – 1 4 1Hstr 1Cstr S. Bareilly 1 – - – 1 – 1Cstr S. Bargny 1 – - – 1 – 1Cstr S. Binningen – 2 – - 2 – - S. Brancaster 1 3 – - 4 – 1Cstr, 1Pstr, buy PRT062607 1Pstr-tet S. Bredeney 5 2 – - 7 – 4Cstr, 1Pstr S. Brive 1 – - – 1 – 1Cstr S. Carmel 1 – - – 1 – - S. Carno 1 – - – 1 – - S. Chandans 2 – - – 2 – 2Cstr S. Chester 1 31 – - 32 1Pmec 29Pstr, 1Cstr, 1Pstr-tet S. Chomedey 4 – - – 4 – 4Cstr S. Colindale 1 – - – 1 – 1Cstr S. Colobane 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl 2 – - – 2 1Cstr 1Cstr S. Dahra 2 – - – 2 – 1Cstr-tet S. Dakar 1 – - – 1 1Cstr – S. Derby – 51 – - 51 5Ptet, 3Pstr, 1Pchl, 1Psul 22Pstr , 1Psul, 1Psul-tet, 7Pstr-tet, 7Pstr-sul, 2Pstr-sul-tet S. Drac 26 – - 1 27 4Cstr 1Hstr, 22Cstr S. Duisburg – 1 – - 1 – 1Pstr S. Eastbourne 2 2 – - 4 – 2Cstr, 1Pstr, 1Pstr-tet S. Farakan 3 – - – 3 1Cstr 1Cstr S. Freetown – 1 – - 1 – 1Pstr S. Fresno – 4 – - 4 1Pstr 1Pstr S. Frintrop 1 – - – 1 – 1Cstr S. Fufu 1 – - – 1 – 1Cstr S. Galiema – 2 – - 2 – 2Pstr S. Gokul 1 – - – 1   1Cstr S. Hato 5 22 – - 27 1Pamp-str-sul-tet-tmp, 1Pamp, 1Pstr 8Pstr, 1Psul-tet, 2Pstr-tet, 1Ptet, 1Cstr S.

Related posts:

  1. : Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimu
  2. DK supervised and participated in the sample collection and manus
  3. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:13256–13264 CrossRefPubMed 38 Pridmore RD:
  4. Claudin two knockdown cells colonized using the Salmonella had re
  5. Infect Immun 1998,66(2):732–740 PubMed 18 Garmory HS, Leary SE,
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>