Test costs and patient time for the four diagnostic test options were based on the authors’ experiences at their home institutions15 (Table 1). The cost for SPT was varied to reflect its use in other countries. Patient time was valued at $19.25 per hour based on Bureau of Labor Statistics averages for persons aged 45 to 64, assuming a 90% employment rate.30 The analyses assumed that patients
who tested MHE-positive would be treated with either lactulose at a monthly cost of Ferrostatin-1 ic50 $15031 or rifaximin 550 mg twice daily at a monthly cost of $1,120 to reduce cognitive impairment and, consequently, the likelihood of involvement in an MVA.24-26 Limited information is available from randomized clinical trials regarding lactulose adherence.10, 21-23 Adherence is greater than 80% in MHE clinical trials, but gastrointestinal adverse effects often force check details poor compliance or reduction in dosage in patients outside of trials.32-34 In the main analysis, lactulose adherence was set to 70% (range: 50% to 90%) and rifaximin adherence was set to 95% (range: 90%
to 99%). Recent studies have found a 0.17 to 0.19 per-person annual crash rate for patients with MHE, versus no MVAs among cirrhosis patients without MHE.6, 17, 18 The analyses assumed that effective pharmaceutical therapy would reduce the crash rate to the baseline level, 0.039, for a similarly aged cohort of persons without cirrhosis,20 and that patients who developed OHE discontinued driving but those who developed decompensated
cirrhosis due to reasons other than OHE were still able to drive. The cost-effectiveness analysis compared the overall cost of MHE diagnosis and treatment (including patient time costs) to the societal savings that are realized by preventing MVAs through effective management of the cognitive Benzatropine impairment observed in MHE patients. The cost-effectiveness ratio for a particular diagnostic strategy (cost per MVA prevented) can be expressed as (C + Tk) / EAR, where C is the total cost of screening patients for MHE during the 5-year period; T is the total number of treatment months for patients who test (true or false) positive for MHE; k is the cost of treatment, per month; E is the number of effective treatment months (i.e., the number of treatment-adherent months for true positives); A is the number of accidents per month for patients with untreated MHE; and R is the reduction in the accident rate due to effective treatment. The cost-effectiveness ratio can be interpreted as the total (gross) cost per MVA prevented by the screening strategy when MHE-positive diagnoses are followed by a specific treatment protocol. National Highway and Traffic Administration data estimate the average societal cost per MVA to be $42,100.20 Consequently, the net cost of a testing/treatment strategy equals (C + Tk) − ($42,100)EAR.
Related posts:
- Current diagnostic methods for ACS in the ED, however, are clearl
- FTY720 Gilenia patient with local recurrence and that person also had synchronous
- 4 These findings make it possible to develop and test suicide pre
- The lack of established normal of care treatment options for cani
- One recommendation is to increase expiratory time as a result of