We could not identify any study showing that the development of p

We could not identify any study showing that the development of pressure ulcer is not related to prolonged pre-operative waiting time. Length of stay Another important reason why many trials were conducted to investigate the impact of timing of surgery is

that it has significant financial implication on the health care system [36, 37]. One of the important indicators of the resources needed is the number of days in hospital or length of stay. Most of the evidence nowadays tends to agree that shortening the pre-operative waiting time would shorten the hospital stay in post-operative as well as the total period. Lefaivre et al. studied all the hip fracture patients admitted to the Epigenetics inhibitor hospital from 1998 to 2001 [13]. They showed that delay in surgery was significantly related to increased time to discharge in acute hospital. Verbeek et al. studied the effect of delaying surgery for more than 1 day [25]. Although there was no significant relationship, there was a trend of fewer complications and shorter hospital stay when patient was operated less than 1 day (p = 0.088). Thomas et al. conducted a specific investigation of the relationship between pre-operative wait and post-operative

stay [38]. The finding was that when the pre-operative hospital stay was increased by two times, the post-operative hospital stay was increased by 19% (p = 0.01). Doruk et al. found a positive relationship selleck chemicals between pre-operative waiting time of more than 5 days and increased total hospitalization time [39]. It is common for learn more investigators to adopt 48 h of admission as the dividing line. Siegmeth et al. found that if patients were operated on after 48 h of admission, the post-operative hospital stay was prolonged by 10.9 days [40]. Similar findings were reported by Hoenig et al. and Bergeron et al. [32, 41]. Still this was not universally supported by all studies. Harries and Eastwood specifically

looked into post-operative length of stay and could not identified any relationship with surgeries done within 24 h [42]. Ho et al. also revealed the waiting time for Casein kinase 1 surgery was not a significant predictor of post-surgery length of stay when confounding factors were controlled [43]. Hamilton et al. also identified a similar result [37]. Although there were some contradictory evidences on the above problem, the overall evidence favored that the shorter the pre-operative waiting time, the shorter will be the overall length of stay. Other outcomes measured Early surgery also reduced the duration of pain and dependency of these patients. Orosz et al. found that earlier surgery was associated with fewer days of severe and very severe pain, although post-operative pain did not differ [28]. Other studies examined the effect of surgical delay on longer-term outcomes. Villar et al.

Related posts:

  1. The overall mean length of hospital stay was 68 days Small vess
  2. In a previous study [3], we carried out a genotypic
  3. A total of 60 patients were admitted for surgery, however, surger
  4. Methods Study design and setting This was a five year descriptive
  5. 10 This instrument is not dependent on prostate size, and tissue
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>