1%) were classified as head direction cells. The percentage of head direction cells was significantly larger than expected by chance for both age groups (large sample binominal test with an expected P0 of 0.05; pre-eye opening: Z = 27.1, p < 0.001; post-eye opening: Z = 26.3, p < 0.001) (Figure 2C). The percentage of head direction cells did not increase from pre-eye opening to post-eye opening (Z = 0.2, p = 0.84), but their directional tuning improved (mean vector length ± SEM before eye opening: 0.47 ± 0.02; after eye opening: 0.61 ± 0.03; t(111) = 3.8, p < 0.001) (Figure 2D). The firing rates of the head direction
cells did not change significantly from pre-eye-opening to post-eye-opening trials (0.54 ± 0.06 and 0.68 ± 0.09, respectively; t(111) = 1.3, p = 0.20), but they were lower than in adult animals [8]. Eye opening was accompanied by significant Small molecule library nmr increases in the directional stability of the cells that passed the selection criterion (Figures 2E and 2F). Before eye opening, directional Selleckchem Sirolimus correlations between the first and the second half of the trial were low, with a mean value of 0.24 ± 0.05 (t(48) = 5.2, p < 0.001). Correlations between trials were at chance level (−0.07 ± 0.04). After eye opening, on P15–P16, the within-trial correlation increased to 0.60
± 0.05, whereas the between-trial correlation increased to 0.53 ± 0.04. Both increases were significant (within trial: t(93) = 5.4, p < 0.001, between trial: t(104) = 10.5, p < 0.001). The increase in stability most likely contributed to the increase in mean vector length in the time-averaged data. After eye opening, directional preferences also rotated along with external cues when the cue card was moved along the wall of the cylinder (Figure S2). During these trials, the cylinder was enclosed by curtains and rotated with the animal out of sight. When the cue card was placed back in the original
position, the cells rotated back to the original position. We asked whether the directional tuning of different cells remained coherent across trials, i.e., if their relative firing directions were maintained, check details in the presence of the instability in absolute firing directions prior to eye opening. Mean absolute firing directions were calculated for each cell on consecutive trials in which two or more cells passed the 95th percentile criterion for mean vector length. Two or more head direction cells were recorded simultaneously in nine pairs of recording trials (22 cells, 20 cell pairs). The difference between mean firing direction on the first and the second trial was calculated for each cell. The average change in preferred firing direction was 113.1° ± 8.4° (mean ± SEM; Figures 3A and 3B). The change in mean firing directions for individual cells was then compared to the change in relative firing direction for each cell pair recorded on the same two trials, i.e., the change across trials in the angular difference between the mean vectors of each cell pair.
Related posts:
- Benefits have been expressed since the percentage of precipitatio
- Ki 67 constructive cells had been expressed like a percentage o
- Cells were defined as border cells if (1) the spatial information
- On the flip side, our future direction could be to build AKT in
- These adjustments have three goals: to support the head and body