79 (1.6, 2.0) 3.13 (2.7, 3.7) Likelihood ratio (−) 0.16 (0.09, 0.28) 0.31 (0.23, 0.42) RFI ≥ 2 RFI ≥ 3 Prevalence of VFx 10% 15% 20% 10% 15% 20% PPV (%) 16.6 24.0 30.9 25.8 35.6 43.9 (95% CI) (15.4, 17.8) (22.5, 25.7) (29.1, 32.8) (22.8, 29.0) (32.0, 39.4) (40.0, 47.9) NPV (%) 98.3 97.3 96.3 96.7 94.8 92.8 (95% CI) (97.0, 99.0) (95.3, MLN0128 price 98.5) (93.5, 97.9) (95.6, 97.5) (93.2, 96.1) (90.6, 94.6) Pre-test odds (given) 0.111 0.176 0.25 0.111 0.176 0.25 Post-test
odds (+) 0.199 0.316 0.448 0.348 0.553 0.783 (95% CI) (0.18, 0.22) (0.29, 0.35) (0.41, 0.49) (0.30, 0.41) (0.47, 0.65) (0.67, 0.92) Post-test odds (−) 0.017 0.028 0.039 0.034 0.054 0.077 (95% CI) (0.03, 0.01) (0.05, 0.02) (0.07, 0.02) (0.05, 0.02) (0.07, 0.04) (0.10, 0.06) Association of vertebral fractures with FRAX® In 744 women who were over 40 (which permitted FRAX calculation), there was a significant
(p < 0.001) association between 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures (FRAX_MO) and prevalent vertebral fractures (Table 2), although the NVP-BEZ235 cost area under the ROC curve was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower than that resulting from RFI model (Table 2). Using different levels of FRAX_MO as a cut-off point for detection of prevalent vertebral fractures, the sensitivity and specificity were 75% (95% CI 68, 82) and 63% (60, 67) for FRAX_MO of 10%, and 59% (51, 67) and 80% (77, 82) for FRAX_MO of 15%. Lower levels of FRAX_MO had higher sensitivity but lower specificity: for FRAX_MO of 7%, the sensitivity and specificity were 85% (79, 91) and 44% (40, 48) and for FRAX_MO of 5% they were 92% (87, 96) and 28% (24, 31). Although FRAX is meant to be applied to untreated patients, we found that the prediction of vertebral fractures by FRAX was if anything higher in the treated Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase patients [ROC of 0.776 (0.711, 0.842)] than in untreated patients [0.721 (0.655, 0.786)]. Results for men The prevalence of vertebral fractures was significantly higher in men than in women (31% vs. 18%, p = 0.003). Men with vertebral fractures
were younger than women (63.1 ± 2.3 vs. 70.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.006), and had lower prevalence of non-vertebral fractures (13% vs. 45%, p = 0.001), but did not differ in other predictors. Among men, only BMD was predictive of vertebral fracture in a logistic regression analysis, with an OR of 2.7 (95% CI = 1.6, 2.8) per each unit decrease in the T-score and area under the ROC curve of 0.738. While height loss was also associated with vertebral fractures (OR of 1.4 per 1 in. of height loss, p = 0.05), this association was not significant when controlled for BMD.
Related posts:
- This likelihood is suppornsition metals and the very low articles
- 29 The likelihood of finding an antidepressant, effect, was highe
- Consequently, the annual turnover ratio is
∼12:1, so that - The sex ratio was not equal inside the offspring; there was a sli
- (b) Plots of specific capacitance and its retention ratio vs vol