Despite this, β2 integrin signaling may contribute to inhibition of TLR responses
through other p38-directed processes, such as by regulating inflammatory cytokine mRNA stability [32] or by influencing NF-κB crosstalk [34, 40], possibilities that remain to be tested experimentally. Our findings are consistent with observations made in the Itgb2hypo mouse on the PL/J background, which suffers from a chronic inflammatory skin disease similar to human psoriasis [41]. Macrophages are required for maintenance of this disease and selective disruption of NF-κB activation in macrophages improves the psoriaform lesions in Itgb2hypo mice [41, 42]. While these results suggest a connection between https://www.selleckchem.com/products/PD-0332991.html β2 integrins and NF-κB regulation, they are complicated by the ongoing disease of the animals and the presence of residual β2 integrin signaling Volasertib in all cell types. However, by using myeloid cells isolated from healthy Itgb2−/− mice
on a C57BL/6 genetic background, we have avoided these issues and have clearly revealed a role for β2 integrins in fine-tuning the NF-κB pathway, demonstrating that β2 integrin signaling can inhibit TLR activation. In attempting to identify the specific β2 integrins required for TLR inhibition, we found that deletion of Mac-1 alone is insufficient to render myeloid cells hyperresponsive
to TLR stimulation. This was a surprising Rutecarpine finding given that Mac-1 activation has been proposed to regulate TLR signaling by inducing Cbl-b activity, leading to degradation of MyD88 and TRIF [19]. Cbl-b is a potent negative regulator of inflammation [43, 44] and it is known to modulate TLR4 activity in neutrophils by facilitating TLR4-MyD88 binding [45]. However, we found that Cbl-b is not required to dampen TLR activation in macrophages. Cblb−/− macrophages were not hypersensitive to TLR stimulation and Cbl-b deficiency did not change the kinetics of MyD88 degradation, as would be predicted based on the model proposed by Han et al. [19] through experiments in HEK293 cells. Thus, our data suggest that inhibiting TLR4 does not require a CD11b-Cbl-b-MyD88 regulatory axis in primary macrophages. Deleting LFA-1 was also not sufficient to cause hypersecretion of inflammatory cytokines in macrophages. We theorize that one or more integrins shared between both cell types are responsible for TLR inhibition and that compensatory integrin signaling is able to block TLR responses in Itgal−/− or Itgam−/− myeloid cells. Our data suggest an important role for cell adhesion events in fine-tuning inflammation. β2 integrins first encounter their ligands within the luminal side of blood vessels.
Related posts:
- In present study, we investigated the relationship among integrin
- Interestingly, actual time PCR didn’t reveal any differential exp
- We also offered proof that DFX activates the MAPK signaling pathw
- Raf Pathway of oxidized sterols may contribute the pathogenesis of disease caused
- 6A These results suggest that S1P and S1P2 contribute, at least