Influenced by earlier clinical observations that children with congenital cataracts have permanent visual deficits after removal of their cataracts, Hubel and Wiesel published three papers in 1963 reporting recordings from V1 at different stages in
the development of normal kittens and kittens in which the vision of one eye had been occluded by eyelid suture (Hubel and Wiesel, 1963, Wiesel and Hubel, 1963a and Wiesel GS-7340 ic50 and Hubel, 1963b). Their discovery that MD in kittens during a brief period in early life produced life-long changes in the functional properties of V1 established a model system for the study of cortical plasticity. The requirement that the mechanisms of normal development must organize cortical connections, and that they might be manipulated to do so normally or abnormally, gave a rational framework for the study of plasticity and its mechanisms. These studies also, of course, had profound clinical implications. While most of Hubel and Wiesel’s discoveries about V1 were made in cats and monkeys, Dräger and Hubel (Dräger, 1975) and the Pearlman laboratory (Wagor et al., 1980) also pioneered the study of V1 in the
mouse 40 years ago, at the time that neurogenetic studies of eye and brain development were beginning to bear fruit and before the modern era of molecular genetics. Recent studies in SB431542 datasheet mouse V1 have demonstrated many Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II similarities with cats and monkeys. For example, the spatial organization of the receptive fields of the most common “simple cells” of mouse V1 appears identical, except for a difference in spatial scale and maximum discharge frequency (Niell and Stryker, 2008). The functional architecture of V1 does, however, differ (Figure 1). V1 neurons in carnivores
and most primates, but not in mice, are arranged in radial columns according to preferred stimulus orientation that progress through a complete cycle of 180 degrees of orientation over about 1 mm of cortex, referred to as an orientation “hypercolumn” (Hubel et al., 1976). The mouse also lacks the much wider ocular dominance columns (ODCs), where neurons favor one eye or the other (Figure 1). In the mouse, neurons selective for different stimulus orientations or for different eyes are scattered throughout V1 apparently at random (Ohki et al., 2005). Orientation and ODCs made it possible to carry out many important experiments because of the relationship between the location of the neurons and their visual response properties. One could, for example, stimulate or deprive one column of cells and not another and measure the physiology, anatomy, or biochemistry of the cells whose responses were perturbed. In the mouse, one cannot infer visual response properties other than topography from the anatomical location of a neuron; one must measure physiology and anatomy at the level of single cells.
Related posts:
- rs of a subset These observations indicate the established recep
- Conclusions and clinical implications Alcohol dependence is a chr
- These results, in addition to other pre clinical and clinical dat
- In this study, most of the rotavirus positive children were from
- Young Children, Jobs Or bcr-abl caspase research