It includes three subscales: ocular discomfort (OSDI-symptom); LY294002 vision-related function (OSDI-function); and environmental triggers (OSDI-trigger). The patients answered the 12 items on the OSDI questionnaire that were graded on a scale of 0–4 (0:
none of the time, 1: some of the time, 2: 50% of the time, 3: most of the time, and 4: all of the time). The OSDI score was calculated from (sum of the scores for all the questions answered) × 25/(the total number of the questions answered). Scores range over 0–100 for the overall score and in each category. A score of 0–12 indicates a normal eye, 13–22 a mild dry eye, 23–32 a moderate dry eye, and > 33 a severe dry eye. It should be noted that a decrease in the OSDI score indicates an improvement. The basic characteristics were compared between LGK-974 manufacturer the two groups using an independent t test for continuous variables or the Chi-square test for categorical variables. The comparisons of outcome measures between the baseline and 8-week visits in each group were performed using a paired t test and the differences in the degree of change were compared between the two groups using an independent t test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 54 participants were included in this study and were randomly
assigned to two groups prior to the study initiation, Silibinin the KRG and placebo groups, of whom 49 participants (24 participants and 25 participants in the KRG and placebo groups, respectively) successfully completed the study (Fig. 1). No significant side effect related to the KRG or placebo was found. The two groups were comparable in their basic characteristics: the mean ages were 59.5 years and 62.0 years (KRG and placebo, respectively); there were slightly more women than men in both groups; and mean IOP was ∼12 mmHg in both groups (Table 1). Compared to the baseline, there was no statistically significant change after 8 weeks in the placebo group using a paired t test, whereas in the KRG group
the mean TBUT score (range from 4.21 ± 1.53 to 6.63 ± 1.64, p < 0.01), conjunctival hyperemia (range from 1.02 ± 0.60 to 0.63 ± 0.45, p = 0.01), and MGD quantity grade (range from 1.58 ± 0.97 to 1.04 ± 0.55, p = 0.04) showed significant improvement. Of these, the change in the TBUT was significantly greater in the KRG group than in the placebo group when the difference in the degree of change between the two groups was analyzed using an independent t test (p < 0.01) ( Table 2, Fig. 2). Table 3 presents the results of the OSDI scores at the baseline and 8-week visits. The mean baseline total OSDI score was 36.22 ± 17.90 and 36.56 ± 19.58 in the KRG and placebo groups, respectively. Virtually all the participants had abnormal OSDI scores. After the 8-week intervention, the total OSDI score in the KRG group was significantly improved from 36.22 ± 17.
Related posts:
- HRQoL is a broad multi-dimensional concept that usually includes
- Thus, we fitted and compared two different models to strengthen o
- Discussion Xerostomia is a very frequent and distressing symptom
- Such a graph includes a set of nodes representing regula tory ele
- This includes tilted excitation methods [42] and [43] and a metho