Subjects ingested the capsules with 12 ounces of bottled water. Following consumption of CRAM or PL subjects rested quietly for 10-minutes prior to completing a 9-question survey and commencing exercise (PRE). The survey consisted of questions describing subjective feelings of energy, fatigue, alertness and focus at that moment. Following Seliciclib the completion of the questionnaire subjects performed a 4-minute quickness
and reaction test on the Makoto testing device (Makoto USA, Centennial CO). Subjects then performed a 10-min bout of exhaustive exercise that included a 30-second Wingate Anaerobic Power test, and the maximal number of push-ups and sit-ups performed in one minute. Subjects then repeated the questionnaire and reaction testing sequence (POST). Results Subjects consuming CRAM maintained reaction time performance between PRE and POST measures, while a significant decline between PRE and POST measures were observed in subjects consuming PL. Acute CRAM supplementation resulted in an ability to maintain focus and alertness following an acute bout of exhaustion. Subjects consuming PL realized significant declines in both focus and alertness, however there were no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion Ingestion of CRAM maintained reaction performance to both visual and auditory stimuli following a high-intensity bout of exhaustive exercise, while subjects consuming a placebo experienced significant reductions
in performance. CRAM might be an effective supplement to improve brain functions in young healthy college students during times of increased stress. Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank
Vadimezan Chemi Nutra, Inc. (White Bear Lake, MN) for providing financial support of this study and MRM (Oceanside, CA) for providing the study material.”
“Abstract We investigated the thermic effect of feeding (TEF) equicaloric (1004.16 kJ) portions of randomly provided fresh squeezed orange juice (17.45 oz) and Protein RushTM (40g protein, 17 oz). Eight subjects (5 women, 3 men; 25.8 ± 9.2 yrs, 174.9 ± 12.4 cm, 71.5 ± 17.5 kg) reported to the lab on subsequent mornings and underwent 30-minutes of resting metabolic rate testing, followed by 2-minutes of drink ingestion, followed by 60-minutes of supine rest. Data were collected via a metabolic cart and ventilated hood. Resting data were subtracted from all post-ingestion Niclosamide measures. Within groups the rate of O2 Nutlin3a uptake (l min-1) increased significantly for protein (+29%, p = 0.03) but not for orange juice (+21%, p = 0.11); when expressed as ml . kg-1 min-1, both groups had significant increases (p < 0.005). Between groups O2 uptake measurements over the 1-hour period revealed a 21% difference between orange juice (2.66 ± 0.6 liters) and protein (3.36 ± 0.9 liters) that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10). Energy expenditure (kJ) determined via the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) revealed orange juice at (60.8 ± 10.1 kJ) and protein (63.7 ± 20.
Related posts: