The results of UV irradiation experiment shown in Figure 4A, clearly suggest that yeast expressing HBx displayed an increased UV hypersensitivity. Since, we earlier showed that HBx interacts with SSL2 and Selleckchem VS-4718 RAD3 component of TFIIH [25],
it is conceivable that the interactions between HBx and SSL2 and/or RAD3 are reflected in the impediment of cellular DNA repair process. To address this issue, HBx point mutants were employed. HBx mutants Glu 120, 121, 124, and 125 were transformed into yeast and assayed for UV hypersensitivity assay. HBxmut120 which fails to interact with human and yeast TFIIH failed to influence the DNA repair in yeast (Figure 4A). The expression of HBxmut proteins in yeast cells was confirmed by Immunoblotting. In all cases, similar levels of HBx expression were observed (data not shown). The results
of the UV hypersensitivity assay are consistent with the hypothesis that the inability of the HBx to interact with TFIIH directly correlates with its inability to impede the DNA repair process. Figure 4 HBx expression increases the UV sensitivity of yeast cells. (A) UV survival profile of HBx expressing yeast cells. Saturated yeast cultures of find more strain 334 containing plasmids, pYES and pYES-Xwt and pYES-Xmuts (as indicated), OICR-9429 clinical trial were diluted in water and plated on YMIN plates containing 2% glucose, 2% glycerol, 2% ethanol and 2% galactose (for induction of HBx). Cells were immediately irradiated under a germicidal lamp. Plates were then incubated in dark for at least 24 hrs and shifted to 30°C. Colonies were counted to determine the survival fraction.
This is the average of three experiments. The ordinate represents the survival fraction, while the abscissa displays the dosage of UV irradiation. (B) UV survival profile of HBx expression in TFIIH mutant yeast cells. This is the average of three experiments. The ordinate represents the survival fraction, while the abscissa displays the dosage of UV irradiation. We next asked the question, does the expression of HBx in the mutant yeast strain lacking the carboxyl-terminus of SSL2 (ERCC3 homologue) affect the UV survival profile? A mutant yeast strain with a deletion of 79aa in the carboxyl terminus of was used in the UV-hypersensitivity experiment selleck antibody [50]. The deletion in ssl2 strain overlaps with the ERCC3 deletion mutant that contains the ATPase activity and does not interact with HBx (data not shown). The yeast strain was transformed with plasmid pGal4-Xwt. In the UV hypersensitivity experiment, HBx did not affect the survival profile of the mutant yeast strain with C-terminal deletion of SSL2 (Figure 4b). These results suggest that TFIIH regulated pathway is utilized by HBx in the impediment of the DNA repair process and that HBx-TFIIH physical interaction is crucial to influence this process.
Related posts: