There exists, however, a concurrent line of studies that has successfully decoded stimulus information (in particular, features) within similar control regions 23, 24••, 25•• and 26]. We turn to
these studies next. Although the majority of work on the Screening Library datasheet frontoparietal attention network has focused on the control of spatial attention, a growing body of research suggests that the network is also involved in the selection of non-spatial information. Studies of feature-based attention have shown that shifting attention from one feature to another [27] leads to increased activation within regions of the frontoparietal network analogous to shift-related changes in space-based attention 28, 29 and 30]. Importantly, the same effect is observed when attentional shifts occur between different values
of the same feature dimension [18], suggesting that shift-related activation patterns cannot be explained by potentially unique interactions between different features and space-based attention. Furthermore, regions of the frontoparietal network carry information about feature values within the current attentional set 24•• and 26]. Liu and colleagues [24••] instructed participants to monitor one of two overlapping motion dot fields that differed PCI-32765 clinical trial either by color or direction of motion in order to detect changes in either luminance or speed (see Figure 2d for an illustration of the color task). Attending to either color or motion led to widespread activation in topographically defined regions along the IPS, as well as frontal regions, and retinotopically defined early visual areas (Figure 2e). Although overall response amplitude in these regions did not differ across within-feature conditions (e.g., attending to green versus attending Megestrol Acetate to red), activation patterns could nonetheless be used to reliably decode the attended feature value (Figure 2f). Finally, the patterns of classifier weights that resulted in successful decoding differed between the attend-to-motion task and the attend-to-color task.
This suggests that directing attention to different feature dimensions is controlled by distinct subpopulations of neurons within the same network. A number of studies have now also implicated the frontoparietal attention network in the control of object-based attention 31 and 32]. Analogous to the increased activation observed following the re-direction of space-based 28, 29 and 30] or feature-based attention 23 and 27], shifting attention in between two spatially overlapping objects increases responses in frontoparietal areas including SPL, IPS and the superior frontal sulcus [31]. In addition to controlling shifts in object-based attention, the frontoparietal network appears to be involved in the maintenance of object-based attentional sets. In a recent study [25••], participants were instructed to detect luminance changes in one of two spatially superimposed triangles.
Related posts:
- Second-line therapy A comprehensive view in the phase-III studies within the sec
- Psychopharmacological first-line treatments of anxietydisorders i
- In this paper, complex network theory is used to analyze the stru
- In this paper, complex network theory is used to analyze the stru
- These authors found that