We examine how well the new model fits the data, and show that it

We examine how well the new model fits the data, and show that it removes the systematic bias between SSM predicted and measured fcrossover. Lastly, we compare the model derived fractal dimension with the measured Cmem to indirectly validate the agreement between the measured and the model derived fractal dimension. Cmem is used to represent the measured fractal dimension since it is possible to promotion obtain its value of the same cells, and we have demonstrated a positive correlation between measured fractal dimension and Cmem. MATERIALS AND METHODS Image acquisition In this study, we used HL-60, MDA-468, and MDA-361 cells. SEM imaging was performed as previously described.21, 22, 27, 28 Briefly, harvested cells were washed first and then fixed in modified Karnovsky��s fixative (280 mOs/kg, pH 7.

5) for at least 30 min. Cell specimens were examined using a Hitachi Model S520 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi Denshi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Each specimen was first scanned to evaluate the cell size and morphological distribution. Then images of representative cells were recorded at a direct magnification of 4000�� onto Polaroid films (Polaroid Corp., Medical Products, Cambridge, MA). For each cell image, a center area of 300��300 pixels (6 ��m��6 ��m) that had little illumination variation was chosen for fractal analysis. Only images taken at the same time under identical conditions were used for comparison. Fractal dimension calculation Fractal dimension of cell plasma membrane is determined from the 2D gray tone SEM image. Ideally, fractal dimension of a rough surface is derived from its 3D profiles.

In biological tissues this is most often not feasible. Instead, gray tone 2D images from optical6, 7, 9, 10, 11 or electron microscopy including SEM are used.8, 31 In several studies of rough surfaces, it was found that fractal dimension derived from 2D SEM images correlated well with that derived from the contact profilometry.31, 32 The SEM images were translated into 8 bit intensity (i.e., in 256 gray levels; black=0, white=255) level pictures. We adopted the Minkowski�CBouligand definition of fractal dimension.10 Through the analysis of the dependence of the intensity variation Vf versus length scale �� in log scale, the fractal dimension DMB is determined by plot). (1) For the images analyzed here, we?log?Vf(��)?log?��?of?DMB=3?(slope calculated Vf for 70 values of ��, ranging from 1 pixel (0.

02 ��m) to 250 pixels (5 ��m). Analysis was accomplished by the algorithms implemented in MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA). Membrane capacitance and crossover frequency measurements Cell membrane capacitance was measured using the electrorotation method as described previously.27 Briefly, cells suspended in 8.5% sucrose 2 mg/ml dextrose were subjected AV-951 to a rotating electric field. The rotation rate of cells was measured as a function of the electric field frequency.

Related posts:

  1. To even further examine this regulatory interaction, we constru
  2. further show that canonical NF ��B signals are required for LMP1
  3. We utilised a model of HSPA1 siRNA with two mismatches : 5?-CGACCGAGACAAGCGCAAG-
  4. We more show the effects of Nodal signaling on actin dynamics and
  5. This approach is supported by experimental data to the kinetic pr
This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>