Figure 5 SEM images of ZnO samples obtained at 6 h deposition time (also at higher magnification). (d, e, f) SEM images of ZnO samples obtained at 6 h deposition time. (d′, e′, f′) The higher-magnification SEM images for the corresponding samples are also presented. Notably, the deposited ZnO rods provide electrical paths between the neighboring finger grid structures. this website The network of ZnO rods covers both the patterned
electrodes and the gaps between them, the electrical circuit being closed without a need for further steps. In Figure 6, plots of the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics measured in air are presented. The electric active area of the ZnO rods is 0.4 mm2. Since the resistance of the metallic fingers is less than 1 Ω, it can be neglected when discussing the samples’ measured resistance, which originates from the deposited ZnO. The growth conditions of the ZnO network of rods are influencing the current values for each of the investigated sample. As it can be seen in the higher-magnification see more SEM images (Figures 4 and 5), the ZnO rods are in contact with each other, forming different types of junctions, like point, cross, or block junctions [41]. The electron transport throughout the network takes place by percolation
through these junctions. The electrical properties of the investigated samples depend on the concentration of free electrons in the conduction band, which can be changed by oxidation or reduction reactions
at the surface new of the rods. This type of response is distinctive for n-type semiconductors [42, 43]. While measuring in air, the atmospheric oxygen is adsorbed on the ZnO surface. The adsorbed oxygen can extract electrons available for conduction and become O2 −, O−, or O2− [44]. Figure 6 The I – V characteristics of all ZnO samples. In order to reveal potential sensing applications for the ZnO networks deposited on interdigitated electrodes, an exposure to ammonia of two samples with higher values for current, sample c and sample f, was employed. In Figure 7, one can notice the differences in current and therefore in resistance when exposing the samples to ammonia for different times. In the CP673451 insets are shown the resistance increases after the exposure to ammonia. Thus, sample c (Figure 7, left) has shown a resistance of 15 MΩ at 0.4 V in air. With ammonia exposure time, the resistance increased up to 20 MΩ (after 5 s), 112 MΩ (after 2 min), and 260 MΩ (after 10 min) at the same voltage. For sample f (Figure 7, right), the resistance was 36 MΩ at 0.4 V in air. The same increase in resistance was noticed with exposure time: up to 92 MΩ (after 5 s), 483 MΩ (after 2 min), and 900 MΩ (after 10 min). An increase in resistance was previously reported in literature when ZnO nanorods [43] or ZnO films [45] were exposed to ammonia.
Related posts:
- In Figure 4a, it can be observed that the lengths of the CNTs are
- Urine samples were obtained preoperatively and 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 a
- Davies�� method executes the segmentation of images by determinin
- All tumor samples had been obtained immediately after permission in the individu
- One was unconscious on admission Both provided urine samples whi