Fisheries science and fisheries management are associated with various forms of uncertainty, which require approaches that go beyond the traditional quantification of uncertain parameters. For
example, specific management measures may fail to fit the policy questions [13]. Questions to reflect on include: Does the scientific method fit the policy problem? (For example whether a single stock TAC approach is appropriate for a mixed fishery); Does the choice of assumptions or scientific method potentially favour certain values at stake? (For example, choosing the assumption of whether a unit of fish comprises one or two stocks may affect the fish and a fisherman in various ways); What are the sources of uncertainty, and to what extent Navitoclax do they matter? (A particular uncertainty may be substantial in itself, but may not affect the effectiveness of a particular management measure); Can the uncertainty be reduced? (Through data collection, other model approaches or other management approaches); Do scientists communicate uncertainties in an understandable way? Scientists and practitioners in natural resource governance have highlighted the value of and the demand for integrating science
and public participation [14, p. 148]. The European Commission (EC) has taken steps in this direction by actively promoting increased stakeholder involvement in fisheries management, for example through the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs). The RACs represent a forum within the CFP, where representatives of the fisheries sector and other interest groups affected by the CFP PARP inhibitor can be consulted [15]. However, Adenosine triphosphate their involvement is indeed mostly restricted to consultation, i.e., providing views on pre-defined management proposals, where scientific advice has already been incorporated [16]. The EC has also supported a number of collaborative research projects (e.g., JAKFISH,1 EFIMAS,2 MEFEPO,3 PRONE,4 GAP and GAP25), and
science–stakeholder partnerships that have investigated ways to effectively and legitimately combine scientific modelling with participatory processes in fisheries governance (Review in [17]) [18] and [19]. One flexible and innovative concept for combining modelling with stakeholder involvement is participatory modelling [20], [21] and [22]. It can solicit input from a wide diversity of stakeholders, facilitate creating a shared vision of complex problems among scientific experts, policy-makers and stakeholders, and help to maintain substantial, structured dialogue between these groups [20], [23] and [24], for an overview see [25]. The European FP7 research project JAKFISH (Judgement and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders) has explored tools to address quantitative and qualitative uncertainties in the models used for fisheries management and policy advice within a participatory modelling process with fisheries stakeholders.
Related posts:
- In order to ensure Yemen׳s commitment, the fisheries act is suppo
- The primary goal of management is obliteration of the fistula to
- The H2RAs are much less powerful for that management of GERD and
- If managers, however, used the initial collapse of the gadoid sto
- Aquaculture is currently the fastest growing food production syst