Kaplan-Meier curves for high versus low expression of gene-level CXCL12 demonstrated that low-expression corresponded with a significantly worse MFS (P < .008, HR = 2.2) but not RFS or OS ( Figure 4, A–C). Similarly, low expression of CXCL12-α corresponded with significantly
worse MFS (P < .033, HR = 1.9) but not RFS or OS ( Figure 4, D–F). Unlike CXCL12-α, low levels of both CXCL12-β and -γ correlated with significantly worse MFS AZD4547 supplier (β isoform P < .0015, HR = 2.6; γ isoform P < .011, HR = 2.2) and RFS (β isoform P < .028, HR = 2.1; γ isoform P < .024, HR = 2.1) but not OS ( Figure 4, G–L). CXCL12-δ, the isoform that does not correlate with expression patterns of other isoforms in breast cancer or normal breast tissue, had a different association with outcomes. Low expression of the δ isoform also showed trends for reduced MFS and RFS ( Figure 4, M and N), although not
statistically significant (MFS, P < .16, HR = 1.5; RFS, P < .077, HR = 1.7). Notably, low CXCL12-δ was the only CXCL12 isoform correlated with worse OS (P < .0035, HR = 1.8; Figure 4O). CXCL12, CXCR4, and CXCR7 do not operate independently but as important components in a complex network. We examined the expression levels of CXCL12-δ, the least understood isoform in the context Daporinad supplier of the expression of the other genes in the pathway. Low CXCL12-δ is independently prognostic for OS even after taking into account CXCL12, CXCR4, and CXCR7 expression (P < .004, HR = 0.56) and shows the same trend in MFS and RFS ( Figure 5, A–C) multi-gene analyses. By nature, clinical samples such as the TCGA contain Liothyronine Sodium a mix of cell types, including tumor cells, normal breast tissue, and vasculature, making it difficult to identify the cell type(s) producing each transcript. To overcome this limitation, we examined RNAseq data in seven breast cancer cell lines for CXCL12 isoforms. Surprisingly, we found that isoform expression shows a different trend than those in the TCGA samples, with
γ showing the highest expression proportion (42%), followed by α (33%) > β (24%). We detected only very low levels of expression for CXCL12-δ (0.5%), -ε (0.1%) and -φ (0.2%). We compared CXCL12 isoform expression levels between cell lines with metastatic potential and those without metastatic potential ( Figure 6) and found that CXCL12 and its α and β isoforms were expressed significantly lower in samples with metastatic potential, which is in agreement with the trends of isoform expression in clinical samples. The same trend was seen with CXCL12-γ, though not statistically significant. While alternative splicing formerly appeared to be limited to a small number of genes, studies now demonstrate that almost all human genes undergo alternative splicing to create protein diversity [42].
Related posts:
- Variations in survival amongst patients with a low versus high le
- Through gene expression proling, quite a few molecular subtypes o
- Also, a number of the sizeable gene expression differences might
- This ob servation was also assessed by RTD PCR The expression of
- Real-time PCR of estrogen receptors Gene expression information w