No examination was conducted prior to enrolment to the study.
All participants that gave informed consent anonymously answered a written survey prior to both live drills (additional file 2). The study design is depicted in figure figure4.4. The two questionnaires were linked selleck chemicals without compromising anonymity and self-efficacy and reaction to the training was calculated. Each question relating to self-efficacy was scored on a 7-point Likert scale Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical with points labelled “Did not work” (1) through “Worked excellent” (7). During both exercises, one instructor documented quality indicators such as over- and undertriage rates. Triage accuracy was calculated according to allocated priority at casualty clearing station (first simulation; without TAS-triage) and according to TAS-triage tags (last simulation; with TAS-triage). The instructors
also measured quality indicator: time from “scene secured” to all patients triaged (minutes). Figure 4 Study Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical design. LEQ = Learners Evaluation Questionnaire. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Ethics deemed that approval was unnecessary (2009/1390a). The Norwegian Social Science Data Services approved the study (22991/2/MAB). STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies and the SQUIRE publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care were utilized in the drafting of this report [9,10]. Data analysis Data were collected in Excel spreadsheets (© 2007 Microsoft Corporation) and analysed in
STATA/SE 10.1 (© Statacorp, TX, USA). Overtriage was fraction of patients Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical given too high priority, whereas undertriage was fraction of patients given too low priority. Continuous variables measured before and after the TAS course were compared using the paired-sample t-test. Results Descriptive A total of 110 emergency service professionals attended one of the four courses and 93 learners (85%) answered the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical questionnaires. Among the study-participants, 26 (28%) worked in healthcare (nurse, ambulance, other), 47 (51%) were fire fighters, 13 (14%) learners were police officers and 7 (7%) had “other” backgrounds. The mean participant else age was 39 years (range 20-62), 84% were men and the median working experience was 8 years (range 0-34). Triage accuracy and time expenditure 48% of the learners confirmed that a system for major incident triage existed in their service, whereas 27% had access to triage tagging equipment. Triage accuracy with and without the use of TAS-triage is depicted in table table1.1. Time from “scene secured” to all patients were triaged was mean 22 minutes (range 15-32) before and mean10 minutes (range 5-21) in the simulation after the course was attended. Table 1 Over- and undertriage without and with the use of TAS-Triage Self-efficacy and reaction to training The slap-wrap triage tags were reported to work well, median = 6 (IQR 6-7). The learners found the paediatric triage tape stretcher feasible, median = 5 (IQR 4-6).
Related posts:
- The call workers systematically asked ambulance callers for infor
- A previous study of military MCI regarding Thai military units in
- 29 The likelihood of finding an antidepressant, effect, was highe
- Importantly, preferential use of medication trials neglects
- 05 As depicted, if 5% of the controls experience delayed fluid