Two ΔluxS Hp mutants have been shown to form biofilms more efficiently than the parent strain, indicating a possible but counterintuitive role of luxS Hp in biofilm reduction [16]. A subsequent study demonstrated that ΔluxS Hp mutants in two strains lost growth-phase-dependent regulation of WZB117 clinical trial the gene encoding the major flagellin FlaA, and that cell culture supernatant containing AI-2 could increase flaA transcription [17]. Studies by two independent groups looked at fitness of ΔluxS Hp mutants in vivo using mouse and gerbil models, respectively [18, 19]. The
motility of ΔluxS Hp mutants was diminished and bacterial fitness reduced in co-infection experiments. Restoration of luxS Hp by genetic complementation partially restored these phenotypes [18, 19]. The authors argued that the decreased fitness in the ΔluxS Hp mutant was most likely due to the disruption of the cycle of SRH consumption and homocysteine synthesis and that AI-2 seemed unlikely to be a QS signal molecule [18]. More recently however, Rader et al. reported that luxS Hp disruption affected SHP099 chemical structure flagellar morphology in the absence of one of the transcriptional regulators (σ28, flgS or flgM), and that this could be complemented upon the addition of DPD. They reported that loss of luxS Hp caused decreased transcription of the flagellar regulator flhA, and that expression of flhA was induced by DPD [20]. This complementation through the addition
of exogenous DPD resurrected the possibility of LuxS-dependent signalling in H. pylori. There are several possible mechanisms many whereby a motility defect IWP-2 could be associated with loss of luxS Hp. Firstly, reduced flagellar structural gene transcription and related protein synthesis would lead to loss of flagella. Secondly, normal flagella structures may be synthesised in the ΔluxS mutant but lack of a functional motor may prevent rotation. Thirdly, both motor and flagellum may be functional,
but unable to respond to tactic signals, leading to aimless movement. In this study, we set out to distinguish between the mechanisms underlying the alteration in motility of ΔluxS Hp mutants, and to clarify whether this originated from a disruption of metabolism or QS. To do this, electron microscopy was employed to examine flagellar assembly and the levels of individual components of flagella were assessed at a transcriptional and translational level. Our demonstration here of the lack of motility defects in mutants disrupted in components of the RTSP other than LuxS, coupled to the inability of cysteine to complement the motility defect of the ΔluxS Hp mutant, shows that disruption of cysteine biosynthesis is not the mechanism underlying the reduction in motility. In contrast, we show that exogenously added AI-2 (or DPD) influences motility via regulating flagellar gene transcription (and thus the number and length of flagella).
Related posts:
- A motile pseudorevertant of ΔrodZ isolated possessed
a ne - Another interesting difference observed was the maximum populatio
- Raltegravir Integrase inhibitor of the p85 mutants also conferred increased Ht Replikationsf
- The triple mutant PS111 grew very poorly and was hypersusceptible
- The triple mutant PS111 grew very poorly and was hypersusceptible