A striking assemblage dominated by stalked crinoids and brachiopods was found at 580-600 m depths on isolated knolls at the northwest and southeast extremities of Admiralty Seamount. The selleck compound seabed at these sites was littered with crinoid ossicles, and crinoid stalk bases were conspicuous on exposed rocks, suggesting that these assemblages have persisted for a considerable period of time. The crinoid sites were limited to the isolated knolls but large areas of the flanks of the main seamount were covered by dense populations of suspension-feeding ophiuroids.
These assemblages are more similar in structure to those preserved in fossil strata from the Palaeocene and late Eocene than to any extant assemblages yet described from the Antarctic. In comparisons with faunal assemblages on Scott Island seamount, the abundance of stalked crinoids was strongly inversely correlated with the abundance of echinoid, asteroid, and lithodid crab predators and both asteroids and echinoids were photographed feeding on crinoids. These observations are consistent with the prevailing hypotheses that crinoid- and ophiuroid-dominated assemblages, which were widespread in the Palaeocene, were displaced
by the radiation https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gm6001.html of mobile predators, and that conditions in isolated habitats in the Southern Ocean may have acted as refugia, allowing the persistence of archaic benthic assemblages. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Background: Over the last 10 years several systematic reviews have been published on the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine studies. Most reviews have concluded that there is not much difference in the cost-effectiveness when delivering health services via telemedicine or by conventional means. We are not aware of any systematic review looking at the systematic reviews of cost-effectiveness of telemedicine. This study was designed
to identify published systematic reviews on the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine studies and to undertake QNZ order a quality assessment of the identified systematic reviews. Materials and Methods: We searched six electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, combining “review” terms with “telemedicine” terms to identify systematic reviews. Results: We identified 4,116 potential abstracts. Nine systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, which looked at the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in general. All reviews were similar in terms of their stated purpose, and the objectives were clear. Three of the reviews did not use a checklist for the economic evaluation studies included in their review. The quality assessment found that five of the nine reviews had minimal flaws.
Related posts: