We showed that null mutation of RpfR, which is an one-component BDSF sensor/response regulator containing a BDSF-binding domain and the GGDEF-EAL domains associated with c-di-GMP metabolism [14], resulted in a similar level of reduction in AHL signal production as the BDSF-minus www.selleckchem.com/products/OSI-906.html mutant ΔrpfFBc (Figure 3A). Given that binding of BDSF by RpfR could substantially increases its activity in c-di-GMP degradation [14], it is rational that increasing c-di-GMP level would lead to down-regulation of the AHL signal production and that decreasing c-di-GMP level would promote AHL signal AMN-107 research buy production. Consisting with the above
reasoning, our results showed that in trans expression of the c-di-GMP synthases, WspR from P. aeruginosa or the GGDEF domain of RpfR, in wild type H111 led to decreased AHL production (Figure 4), and that reducing c-di-GMP level in the BDSF-minus buy 4SC-202 mutant ΔrpfFBc by overexpressing either RocR from P. aeruginosa or the EAL domain of RpfR resulted in increased AHL signal biosynthesis (Figure 4).
These findings have elucidated a signaling pathway with which the BDSF-type QS system regulates the AHL-type QS system in B. cenocepacia and, additionally, have also further expanded our understanding of the c-di-GMP signaling mechanisms in modulation of bacterial physiology. However, how c-di-GMP controls AHL signal production remains to be further investigated. Identification of the second messenger c-di-GMP as a key element in the BDSF/c-di-GMP/AHL signaling pathway is also critical for explanation of the seeming puzzling relationship
between BDSF and AHL systems in regulation of bacterial physiology and virulence and for elucidation of the QS regulatory mechanisms in B. cenocepacia H111. Our data showed that both BDSF and AHL systems control similar phenotypes including bacterial motility, biofilm formation and protease production with an obvious cumulative effect (Figure 5). How these two QS systems interact in regulation and coordination of various biological functions? Do they act in cascade or independently? Our data support a partial “cascade” and a partial “independent” signaling mechanisms. Firstly, knocking out BDSF production affects AHL production but only partially reduced the total AHL level (Figure 1). Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase Secondly, null mutation of RpfR, which acts as a net c-di-GMP degradation enzyme upon interaction with BDSF [14], showed an almost identical effect on AHL signal production as the BDSF-minus mutant (Figure 3). Thirdly, double deletion of the BDSF synthase gene rpfF Bc and the AHL synthase gene cepI showed a more severe impact on bacterial physiology and virulence than the corresponding single-deletion mutants (Figures 5 and 6). Finally, exogenous addition of either BDSF or AHL could only partially rescue the changed phenotypes of the double deletion mutant ΔrpfFBcΔcepI but a combination of BDSF and AHL could completely restore the changed phenotypes (Figure 5).
Related posts: